AS FALAS DAS PERSONAGENS EM LUCANO: SUAS RELAÇÕES ENTRE SI E COM A VOZ DO NARRADOR.
Palavras-chave:
Lucan’s Civil War. Speeches. Dialogue.Resumo
This article explores dialogical relationships between different speeches, and between speeches and narrator-text, in Lucan’s Bellum Ciuile. The analysis is not merely concerned with the identification of parallels linking discourses by different voices, but rather presupposes that the voices delivering these discourses make statements which respond to one another in a debate. The concept of responsion embraced here implies that the voices are (self-consciously or otherwise) assuming ideological positions in relation to one another and competing for rhetorical and political supremacy in the narrative. All through the emphasis is on passages interpreted as rejoinders to other passages. These replies are always rooted in the interests of particular speakers. I follow previous scholarship in seeing Lucan’s narrator almost as a character, but go on to argue that this narrator-character is in constant verbal interaction with the other characters’ speeches.Referências
AHL, F. Lucan: an introduction. Ithaca; London: Cornell University Press, 1976.
ALEXANDRE JÚNIOR, M.; ALBERTO, P. F.; PENA, A. do N. Aristóteles, Retórica. Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional-Casa da Moeda, 1998.
ANZIGER, S. Schweigen im römischen Epos: zur Dramaturgie der Kommunikation bei Vergil, Lucan, Valerius Flaccus und Statius. Berlin; New York: W. de Gruyter, 2007.
BAKHTIN, M. M. Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Ed. and trans. by C. Emerson. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1984.
BAKHTIN, M. M. (VOLOCHÍNOV, V. N.). Marxismo e filosofia da linguagem. Trad. de M. Lahud et al. 6 ed. São Paulo: Hucitec, 1992.
BARCHIESI, A. Speaking volumes: narrative and intertext in Ovid and other Latin poets. Ed. and trans. by M. Fox and S. Marchesi. London: Duckworth, 2001.
BARRATT, P. M. Annaei Lucani Belli ciuilis liber V: a commentary. Amsterdam: Hakkert, 1979.
BARTSCH, S. Ideology in cold blood: a reading of Lucan’s Civil war. Cambridge, Mass.; London: Harvard University Press, 1997.
BASORE, J. W. Direct speech in Lucan as an element of epic technic. TAPhA 35, pp. xciv-xcvi, 1904.
BONNER, S. F. Lucan and the declamation schools. AJPh 87, pp. 257-89, 1966.
CASALI, S. Other voices in Ovid’s “Aeneid”. In: KNOX, P. E. (ed.). Oxford readings in Ovid. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 144-65.
CONTE, G. B. La “guerra civile” di Lucano: studi e prove di commento. Urbino: QuattroVenti, 1988.
CONTE, G. B. The rhetoric of imitation: genre and poetic memory in Vergil and other Latin poets. Trans. by a team under the direction of the author, ed. and with a foreword by C. Segal. Ithaca; London: Cornell University Press, 1986.
D’ALESSANDRO BEHR, F. Feeling history: Lucan, stoicism, and the poetics of passion. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2007.
D’ALESSANDRO BEHR, F. The narrator’s voice: a narratological reappraisal of apostrophe in Virgil’s Aeneid. Arethusa 38, pp. 189-221, 2005.
DILKE, O. A. W. M. Annaei Lucani De bello ciuili liber VII. Revised from the edition of J. P. Postgate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960.
DUE, O. S. An essay on Lucan. C&M 23, pp. 68-132, 1962.
DUE, O. S. Lucain et la philosophie. In: DURRY, M. (ed.). Lucain: sept exposés suivis de discussions. Genève: Fondation Hardt, 1970, pp. 201-32.
DUFF, J. D. Lucan, The civil war (Pharsalia). With an English translation. Cambridge, Mass.; London: Harvard University Press, 1928.
EFFE, B. Epische Objektivität und subjektives Erzählen: "auktoriale" Narrativik von Homer bis zum römischen Epos der Flavierzeit. Trier: WVT Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, 2004.
FANTHAM, E. Lucan, De bello ciuili, book II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
FAUST, R. De Lucani orationibus, pars I, Pharsaliae librorum I. II. III. orationes continens. Königsberg, 1908. Tese (Doutorado) ___ Albertus-Universität zu Königsberg.
FLOBERT, P. Traits du latin parlé dans l’épopée: Lucain. In: CALLEBAT, L. (ed.). Latin vulgaire — latin tardif IV: actes du IVe colloque international. Hildesheim; Zürich: Olms, 1995, pp. 483-9.
FOGEL, A. Coerced speech and the Oedipus dialogue complex. In: MORSON, G. S.; EMERSON, C. (edd.). Rethinking Bakhtin: extensions and challenges. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1989, pp. 173-96.
FOWLER, D. Deviant focalisation in Virgil’s Aeneid. PCPhS 216, pp. 42-63, 1990.
GENETTE, G. Figures III. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1972.
GENETTE, G. Métalepse: de la figure à la fiction. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 2004.
GENETTE, G. Nouveau discours du récit. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1983.
GETTY, R. J. Lucan, De bello ciuili I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1940.
GUNDERSON, E. Declamation, paternity and Roman identity: authority and the rhetorical self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
HEITLAND, W. E. Introduction. In: HASKINS, C. E. M. Annaei Lucani Pharsalia. London: George Bell and Sons; Cambridge: Deighton, Bell and Co., 1887, pp. ix-cxvi.
HELZLE, M. Der Stil ist der Mensch: Redner und Reden im römischen Epos. Stuttgart; Leipzig: Teubner, 1996.
HORNBLOWER, S. Thucydides. London: Duckworth, 1987.
HOUSMAN, A. E. M. Annaei Lucani Belli ciuilis libri decem. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1926.
JOHNSON, W. R. Momentary monsters: Lucan and his heroes. Ithaca; London: Cornell University Press, 1987.
LEIGH, M. Lucan: spectacle and engagement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
LEIGH, M. Quintilian on the emotions (Institutio oratoria 6 preface and 1-2). JRS 94, pp. 122-40, 2004.
LYNE, R. O. A. M. Further voices in Vergil’s Aeneid. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.
LYNE, R. O. A. M. Words and the poet: characteristic techniques of style in Vergil’s Aeneid. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
MARTI, B. Lucan’s narrative techniques. PP 30, pp. 74-90, 1975.
MASTERS, J. Deceiving the reader: the political mission of Lucan Bellum ciuile 7. In: ELSNER, J.; MASTERS, J. (edd.). Reflections of Nero: culture, history & representation. London: Duckworth, 1994, pp. 151-77.
MASTERS, J. Poetry and civil war in Lucan’s Bellum ciuile. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
MAYER, R. Lucan, Civil war VIII. Warminster: Aris & Phillips, 1981.
MORFORD, M. P. O. The poet Lucan: studies in rhetorical epic. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1967.
MYNORS, R. A. B. P. Vergili Maronis opera. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969.
NARDUCCI, E. Deconstructing Lucan ovvero Le nozze (coi fichi secchi) di Ermete Trismegisto e di Filologia. In: ESPOSITO, P.; NICASTRI, L. (edd.). Interpretare Lucano. Napoli: Arte tipografica, 1999, pp. 39-83.
NARDUCCI, E. Lucano: un'epica contro l'impero: interpretazione della "Pharsalia". Roma; Bari: Laterza, 2002.
PARATORE, E. História da literatura latina. Trad. de M. Losa. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, 1987.
PARRY, A. The two voices of Virgil’s Aeneid. In: COMMAGER, S. (ed.). Virgil: a collection of critical essays. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1966, pp. 107-23.
PERRY-ALLONCLE, A. Rhétorique et guerres civiles dans la Pharsalia de Lucain. BAGB 1, pp. 188-203, 2004.
PITCHER, L. V. A perfect storm? Caesar and his audiences at Lucan 5.504-702. CQ 58, pp. 243-9, 2008.
ROBERTS, G. A glossary of key terms. In: MORRIS, P. (ed.). The Bakhtin reader: selected writings of Bakhtin, Medvedev and Voloshinov. London; New York; Melbourne; Auckland: E. Arnold, 1994, pp. 245-52.
ROLIM DE MOURA, A. Speech, voice, and dialogue in Lucan’s Civil war. Oxford, 2008. Tese (Doutorado) ___ University of Oxford.
ROSS, W. D. Aristotelis Ars rhetorica. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1959.
ROSTOVTZEFF, M. História de Roma. Trad. de W. Dutra. 5. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan, 1983.
SCHLONSKI, F. Studien zum Erzählerstandort bei Lucan. Trier: WVT Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, 1995.
SCHMITT, A. W. Die direkten Reden der Massen in Lucans Pharsalia. Frankfurt: P. Lang, 1995.
SCHRIJVERS, P. The “two cultures” in Lucan: some remarks on Lucan’s Pharsalia and ancient sciences of nature. In: WALDE, C. (ed.). Lucan im 21. Jahrhundert. München; Leipzig: K. G. Saur, 2005, pp. 26-39.
SYNDIKUS, H. P. Lucans Gedicht vom Bürgerkrieg: Untersuchungen zur epischen Technik und zu den Grundlagen des Werkes. München, 1958. Tese (Doutorado) ___ Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität zu München.
TASLER, W. Die Reden in Lucans Pharsalia. Erlangen; Nürnberg, 1971. Tese (Doutorado) ___ Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg.
VIEIRA, B. V. G. Farsália de Lucano (I a IV): prefácio, tradução e notas. Araraquara, 2007. Tese (Doutorado) ___ Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”.
VOLOŠINOV, V. N. Marxism and the philosophy of language. Trans. by L. Matejka and I. R. Titunik. New York; London: Seminar Press, 1973.
WALSH, P. G. Livy, book XXI. Bristol: Bristol Classical Press, 1973.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Ao se submeterem textos para a PhaoS, seus autores devem estar cientes de que, se aprovados para publicação, a revista terá sobre eles todos os direitos autorais pertinentes. Originais não serão devolvidos.
